Cancel OK

California Market Enforcement Branch

Reviewing the agency’s role in protecting state produce suppliers
Market Enforcement Branch

Negatives
Just as the laws governing MEB’s functioning continue to change, so too does the agency itself and the environment under which it operates.

Both Rynn and Shandler report that PACA, though a federal agency, has begun taking more cases involving produce within the state of California in recent years, resulting in a slow decline in the number of complaints filed with MEB and a subsequent lessening of its perceived effectiveness.

Additionally, a 2013 departmental shakeup led to the retirement of the former MEB chief, who had over 30 years of experience. “This left a new chief and investigators,” comments Rynn, “with less experience in conducting mediations, resolving disputes, and overseeing audits.”

The Future
The future of MEB may depend on how the Branch and its personnel are able to handle trade organizations and federal agencies encroaching on the agency’s terrain.

Although industry sources were effusive in their praise regarding disputes and the mediation process, as well as saving time, money, and resources for both the state and the parties involved—the days ahead could present a number of challenges.

Based on the agency’s extensive history and reputation for workable solutions, the Market Enforcement Branch should be able to weather the storm and continue to provide buyers and sellers of fresh produce with satisfactory results.

Image: Shutterstock

Twitter

Leonard Pierce is a freelance writer with more than twenty years experience in the food industry.